
Electrify industrial heat generation to eliminate emissions
总结
Electrification of industrial processes achieves higher energy efficiency, lowers emissions, and improves resilience to fossil fuel price shocks.
Context
Industry accounts for 25% of total CO₂ emissions from energy systems, with process heat making up nearly two-thirds of industrial energy demand. Today, more than 80% of this heat still comes from fossil fuels, making its decarbonization essential for achieving net-zero emissions. Fortunately, various renewable heating solutions, such as heat pumps, solar thermal, and thermal energy storage, are already commercially available
Despite its potential, electrification remains underutilized in industry. In 2022, only around 4% of industrial heat globally was electrified. However, this share is projected to nearly triple to 11% by 2028, according to the International Energy Agency.[1] The long-term potential is even greater as approximately 60% of industrial heat could be electrified using commercially available technologies today, with this figure expected to rise to 90% by 2035 as emerging technologies mature.[2] Importantly, all industrial heat demand below 500°C can already be met with mature electric solutions.[3]
Solution
Electrification solutions encompass a wide range of technologies that supply heat using electricity instead of burning fuel. They generate heat in industry through various principles, such as resistance heating (passing electric current through a conductor), induction heating (using fluctuating magnetic fields), electric arc heating (creating high-temperature arcs), or heat pumps (heat transfer via compression cycles). Depending on the technology employed, these solutions can cater to a wide range of applications, including those requiring temperatures above 1,800°C.
Figure 1: Simplified schema of a heat pump system

Electrification solutions for industrial heat can be roughly grouped into three main categories – electric boilers, heat pumps, and electric furnaces.
Electric boilers use electricity to heat up water either by flowing it through the water (electrode boiler) or by heating up metal which then transfers the heat to the water (resistance boiler). They are drop-in replacements for fossil fuel boilers and are suitable for a wide range of industrial steam applications.
Heat pumps transfer heat from a lower-temperature source (e.g. air, water, or waste heat) to a higher-temperature sink by circulating and compressing a working fluid using electricity. They are highly efficient because they move existing heat rather than generating it. This efficiency is measured by the Coefficient of Performance (COP), which indicates how many units of heat are delivered per unit of electricity consumed. In industrial applications, COPs typically range from 2 to 5, meaning 1 unit of electricity can provide 2 to 5 units of heat, and in certain applications can exceed 10. This category also includes Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) systems, which recover and compress waste steam to a higher temperature and pressure, enabling its reuse in industrial processes.
Electric furnaces usually heat up air or materials directly, making them more suitable for high-temperature applications. They include technologies such as resistive heating, plasma torches, shock-wave heating, or induction.

Usage
Project details | Decisive parameters | Barriers faced | Success factors | Ease of process integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Måløy, Norway Food & Beverage 4.5 MWth | Availability of two waste heat streams (35-70°C water and 85°C water from drying process) to allow the heat pump system to produce steam (130-140°C) Limited grid capacity could not support an electric boiler High efficiency with COP 3.5 rising up to 7 when recovering excess heat with higher quality | Complexity of integrating waste heat streams to get stable temperature and flow Initial uncertainty about the quality and consistency of waste heat Technical complexity in matching steam output with process needs due to varying production requirements | Rising energy costs and need to reduce reliance on steam generated by fossil fuels Strong environmental (4,000 tons CO₂/year reduction) and economic performance aligned with Pelagia’s sustainability goals Large capacity shows replicability of the system across other sites Availability of grants from ENOVA supporting the project. | Needed to retrofit existing process layout and infrastructure which required engineering coordination The heat pump system is multistage with ammonia heat pump (producing steam) and a steam compressor (increasing steam temperature) The system required customized integration, but it did not cause major process disruption |
Tiense Suikerrafinaderij – GEA Refrigeration – Danish Technological Institute Tienen, Belgium Food & Beverage 4 MWth | Required process temperature (138°C, 3.5 bar(a) steam) and waste heat temperature (76°C, 0.55 bar(a) steam) are suitable for a high temperature heat pump. High efficiency compared to other technologies The heat pump complied with food safety standards | The used working fluid (pentane) is flammable which required constructing a separate building and using specialized equipment to minimize risks Stainless steel heat exchangers required more space than expected | Commitment of all partners to the project and close collaboration External expert support regarding the mitigation of risks associated with using flammable working fluid Co-funded by Horizon Europe under the Spirit-Heat project | The new building housing the heat pump required longer sections of piping and electrical wiring. Existing boiler was retained to help with startup of the heat pump and to support operation. The heat pump needed some design corrections during the integration due to its novel design. |
Philip Morris Investments – JOA Air Solutions Bergen Op Zoom, The Netherlands Tobacco 3.2 MWth | Environmental impact (2,000 tons CO₂/year reduction) and efficiency gains The financial viability of the heat pump based on the installation costs, operational costs, savings, and project payback | The room needed work done to ensure safety compliance for the ammonia heat pump. Coordination between multiple suppliers proved challenging, especially in terms of timelines, equipment lead times, and availability for on-site activities. | Good collaboration with different stakeholders (internal and external) such as engineering consultants, contractors, and internal project teams. This was essential for overcoming challenges and ensuring the project’s success. | Minimizing downtime was crucial with factory shutdowns used to avoid major disruptions. Technicians were trained by the supplier to operate the system. Automation and control systems helped in seamlessly integrating the heat pumps with the existing process. |
More use cases available in the WBCSD’s Renewable industrial heat navigator brief: Electrification solutions.
Impact
Sustainability impact
Climate
Carbon savings from electrification depend on the carbon intensity of electricity used. In extreme cases, such as regions still heavily reliant on coal, like parts of India, electrification can paradoxically result in higher overall emissions. The benefits can be therefore maximized through combination with power purchase agreements or on-site renewable power generation. However, typical emissions reduction is 200-400 kg CO2-eq per MWh of electrified heat.
Another consideration is the global warming potential (GWP) of the working fluid used in a heat pump. In the event of leakage, some working fluids can contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, modern heat pumps use only low-GWP working fluids, such as ammonia or hydrocarbons, to minimize climate impact.
Nature
Electrification solutions have limited land footprint and can be installed into existing industrial sites, not needing additional land.
Social
Electrification eliminates local air pollution (NOx and other harmful emissions) associated with conventional combustion of fossil fuels.
Business impact
Benefits
Electrification solutions offer several advantages over conventional fossil fuel systems and even other renewable heat options, such as solar thermal:
They have higher energy efficiency, especially in the case of heat pumps, which can deliver up to 10 times more heat than the electricity they consume.
They can supply heat across a wide range of temperatures, from low-grade heating to high-temperature applications above 1,800°C, and can be scaled from a few kilowatts to tens of megawatts.
They can be aggregated to provide flexibility services to the electricity grid, creating opportunities for additional revenues from demand-side management.
They are versatile and precise, offering improved control over temperature levels and heat quality, improved worker safety, and often more efficient product processing.
They have a limited land footprint compared to solar thermal, making them suitable for retrofitting into existing industrial sites.
They reduce onsite air pollution, eliminating combustion-related emissions and supporting cleaner, quieter industrial operations.
Costs
Key commercial parameters | Value Electric boilers | Value Heat pumps | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Capital expenditure (1) | 150-400 €/kW | 200-1500 €/kW | ↑ The required temperature lift is the primary driver of capital costs, particularly when multiple heat pumps must be staged to achieve higher temperatures. ↑ Integration costs can add 50–200% to the base cost of the heat pump system, especially when civil works or additional expensive equipment, such as compressors or heat exchangers, are needed. ↑ Steam producing heat pumps are generally more expensive than those delivering hot water. ↑ Higher process temperature requirements in general contribute to increased capital costs. ↓ Using standardized, off-the-shelf heat pump systems can significantly reduce overall costs. ↓ Smaller-capacity heat pumps typically involve lower integration complexity and costs. ↓ Bulk procurement of integration equipment helps reduce equipment and installation expenses. |
Operational cost (excluding electricity) | 3-5% | 1-6% | Maintenance costs vary based on system complexity. Some systems require only periodic inspections and occasional replacement of basic components, while others involve more intensive upkeep, such as frequent cleaning of heat exchangers, which increases operational costs. In certain jurisdictions, regulations may require a full-time operator for heat pump systems, significantly raising overall operating expenses. |
Levelized Cost of Heat (2) | 60-240 €/MWh | 25-120 €/MWh | The levelized cost of heat delivered by electric boilers and heat pumps is primarily determined (up to 90%) by the price of electricity. The technical appendix of Systemiq’s report on electrothermal energy storage provides generic LCOH calculations for several European and US markets. The base LCOH for heat pumps (excluding price of electricity) is around 10-30 €/MWh. |
The commercial viability of electrification is closely connected with the achieved energy efficiency:
Value Electric boilers | Value Heat pumps | Context | |
Efficiency | 99% | 250-450% (COP 2.5-4.5) | The efficiency of a heat pump is determined by the temperature lift required. As the temperature lift increases, efficiency decreases. |
At 20°C lift | n/a | 600-900% (COP 6-9) | Efficiency determines the economic viability of a heat pump system. To be cost-competitive, the COP must exceed the "spark gap" (the ratio of electricity prices to fossil fuel prices) so that operational costs are lower than those of a fossil-based alternative. |
At 50°C lift | n/a | 350-450% (COP 3.5-4.5) | |
At 100°C lift | n/a | 200-300% (COP 2-3) | In most cases, a COP below 2.5 makes it difficult to achieve economic feasibility, except in regions with exceptionally low electricity prices, such as northern Norway. |
Implementation
Implementation
Typical business profile
Electrification solutions are currently best suited for companies in sectors such as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, paper & pulp, or chemicals, which use low and medium temperature heat. Commercially available electrification technologies can already cover all of their heat demand.
However, electrification has the potential to decarbonize heat in almost all industries, even including chemicals, steel, and cement. For example, electric arc furnaces used for recycling of scrap metal already deliver heat with temperatures over 1800°C and are technologically mature. Therefore, specific applications, such as electric steam crackers or flat glass lines, are currently under development.
Approach
Electrification solutions are usually implemented as a capital investment project. However, they can be combined with Heat-as-a-Service.
Electrification solutions can be implemented to intentionally cover only parts of the heat demand. For example, when installing an electric boiler, the existing fossil fuel boiler can be retained. This allows companies to switch between systems based on current energy prices (e.g. run the electric boiler only during the day when electricity prices are low thanks to solar PV). This can be a practical first step toward electrification. Additionally, utilities and other energy companies offer flexible tariffs where they supply both the electricity and the fossil fuel based on which is cheaper.
Stakeholders involved
Manufacturing plant director: Electrification solutions supply heat which is instrumental to the manufacturing processes. The implementation project therefore requires strong buy-in from the plant leadership.
Operations: In addition to the plant leadership, company-level operations professionals should bring in specialized expertise and experience from similar projects.
Finance: Electrification usually represents a large capital investment which in most companies requires approval of an investment committee including finance professionals.
Sustainability: Electrification significantly reduces Scope 1 emissions and should be included in long-term emissions reduction plans.
Key parameters to consider
Temperature lift of heat pumps: Temperature lift refers to the difference between the heat source temperature (e.g. waste heat) and the heat sink temperature (i.e. the required process temperature). The higher the temperature lift, the lower the system efficiency (COP) and the higher the capital expenditure (CapEx). For example, achieving very high lifts may require a multistage configuration, where multiple heat pumps are connected in series. Typical industrial applications involve temperature lifts ranging from 50°C to 100°C.
Availability of waste heat for heat pumps: Heat pumps require a stable waste heat source. To ensure reliability, this source can be combined with thermal storage to deliver consistent heat when needed. Common industrial waste heat sources include exhaust gases, humid air from dryers, hot air from machine rooms, low-pressure steam, or condensate from cooling processes. The waste heat can originate from the same process it serves. For example, hot air from a dryer can be condensed and used to supply a heat pump that, in turn, heats the dryer itself.
Grid access: For electric boilers, the required electrical connection capacity directly corresponds to the replaced fossil fuel capacity. Heat pumps require significantly less electrical capacity, as their rated thermal output (in MW) must be divided by their efficiency (COP) to determine the actual electrical demand.
Implementation and operations tips
Common implementation success factors reported by companies are:
Availability of subsidies for innovative or energy efficient projects
Aim to increase energy efficiency and reduce reliance on fossil fuels
Successful cooperation among all external and internal stakeholders to integrate the solution
Going further
External links
https://www.wbcsd.org/resources/renewable-industrial-heat-navigator-brief-electrification-solutions/
Source list
(1) International Energy Agency (2024). Renewables 2023. Retrieved from https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/96d66a8b-d502-476b-ba94-54ffda84cf72/Renewables_2023.pdf.
(2) Fraunhofer ISI (2024). Direct electrification of industrial process heat. An assessment of technologies, potentials and future prospects for the EU. Study on behalf of Agora Industry. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-3407
(3) McKinsey & Company (2024). Net-zero electrical heat: A turning point in feasibility. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/sustainability/our-insights/net-zero-electrical-heat-a-turning-point-in-feasibility#/
(4) Values based on ‘SYSTEMIQ (2024). Catalysing the Global Opportunity for Electrothermal Energy Storage. Retrieved from: https://www.systemiq.earth/electrothermal-energy-storage/’ and corroborated by contributing experts.
(5) Values based on ‘SYSTEMIQ (2024). Catalysing the Global Opportunity for Electrothermal Energy Storage. Retrieved from https://www.systemiq.earth/electrothermal-energy-storage/’ and corroborated by contributing experts.